Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Congress

State to pay $3M in plaintiffs’ attorney fees in Congressional redistricting suit

The expense is added to an already hefty bill for the suit, with the state paying outside counsel to assist.

The VRA Remedial Plan map.
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

The State of Alabama agreed Monday to pay $3 million in attorney’s fees to the plaintiffs in a lawsuit that resulted in a special master drawing new Congressional district lines.

The legal battle over the map has been expensive, with the state bringing in outside counsel to help make its case  that it had not violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act in drawing either challenged map.

The state’s arguments were rejected at each level of court. The U.S. Supreme Court allowed a lower federal panel’s order to go into effect that required state lawmakers to enter a special session to draw a new map. When the panel dismissed the new map as failing to fix the issues, the Supreme Court denied to take up the state’s appeal.

The new map has created a newly competitive 2nd Congressional District seat, with the race  underway between Democratic nominee Shomari Figures and Republican nominee Caroline Dobson.

The new district isn’t quite majority-minority, but it is much closer than what Alabama lawmakers had come up with and what the court found to violate the Voting Rights Act by disenfranchising Black voters. 

The settlement satisfies the attorney fees for all of the court action that has happened thus far in the case, but the case technically remains active. The state could still be on the hook for any future fees incurred by the plaintiffs if the suit is litigated further.

Jacob Holmes is a reporter at the Alabama Political Reporter. You can reach him at jholmes@alreporter.com

More from APR

Featured Opinion

For some reason, politicians in this state are comfortable with the idea of politicians picking their voters, instead of vice versa.

Courts

Some leaders in the state Republican Party are already looking to reconfigure the 2nd Congressional District yet again.

Courts

The case has sparked alarm among reproductive health advocates, as it signals potential threats to IVF practices.

Elections

Judge David Proctor reaffirmed his earlier ruling, maintaining that the law likely violates the Voting Rights Act.