Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Legislature

Congressional, Alabama House districts reach final passage in state Senate

In the Senate Wednesday, both bills received near-unanimous opposition from Democratic senators.

The Alabama Senate during a special session on redistricting. (JOHN H. GLENN/APR)

The Alabama Senate completed the final passage of congressional and Alabama House district maps Wednesday, sending them forward to the governor’s office for Gov. Kay Ivey’s signature.

In the Senate Wednesday, both bills received near-unanimous opposition from Democratic senators and unanimous support from the Republican side.

With the passage of the Alabama Senate districts in the House the same day, the redrawn districts will likely preserve the Republican supermajority in the state Legislature and majority in the U.S congressional delegation.

“We’re done with redistricting bills — expect for the lady across the street,” said Sen. Jim McClendon, R-Springville, after the Senate adjourned Wednesday. “It’s been a many months-long process that culminated today.”

During deliberations of House Bill 1, congressional district maps remained unscathed from several proposed substitutions brought forward by Senate Democrats and two Senate Republicans.

State Sen. Rodger Smitherman, D-Birmingham, file a substitute congressional district map, created by the League of Women Voters, which would keep counties whole and modify the 7th Congressional District — the state’s only majority-minority congressional district.

The 7th Congressional District would no longer be majority Black if the plan was adopted, according to Smitherman, but remain majority-minority through other minorities living within the district.

“We generally talk about anywhere from 25, to closer to 27 percent of African-Americans live in this state, but in reality, the minority population in this state is in the mid-thirties,” Smitherman said after the Senate adjourned Wednesday. “That’s one-third of the representation, as it relates to minorities.”

Maps on the Alabama Senate during a special session on redistricting. (JOHN H. GLENN/APR)

The plan would also have provided for a swing district in the 6th Congressional District, currently occupied by Congressman Gary Palmer, R-Alabama, drawing together parts of the 7th to create what Smitherman described as “an opportunity district.”

Both Smitherman and Senate Minority Leader Bobby Singleton, D-Montgomery, are involved in a federal lawsuit to draw a second majority-minority district for Alabama’s U.S Congressional maps.

State Sen. McClendon, R-Springville, said the map would “pit two incumbents” in the 6th District and eliminate the sole majority-minority district in the 7th District. McClendon also criticized the creation of the so-called “opportunity” district in the 6th District.

Smitherman’s substitution ultimately failed, with similar substitutions filed by Minority Leader Bobby Singleton, D-Montgomery, and Sen. Kirk Hatcher, D-Montgomery, also failing on the floor.

One substitution, preposed by Sen. J.T. “Jabo” Waggoner, R-Vestavia Hills, relating to specific district lines in Jefferson County around the greater Birmingham area, received bipartisan support from certain members in the Senate.

Waggoner’s substitution would keep East Lake, Roebuck, and Center Point within the U.S. 7th Congressional District’s lines and Homewood within the 6th Congressional District. Under the approved congressional districts, these areas swap districts, according to Waggoner.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

“I think it is important to know that these districts as they are today, they met all the requirements of the Voting Rights Act,” Waggoner said. “Congressman Palmer would stay in Homewood, [and] Congresswomen Sewell would keep her Center Point, East Lake, Roebuck area.”

Waggoner also mentioned that both the mayor of Homewood, Patrick McClusky, and the mayor of Center Point, Bobby Scott, support keeping the districts as they previously were drawn.

Sens. Dan Roberts, R-Birmingham; Del Marsh, R-Anniston; and Smitherman all spoke in support of the substitution.

McClendon said that due to court orders to draw the districts “race-blind” and that the 7th Congressional District lost 53,000 people within the district lines, they had to reach into the 6th Congressional District to “get our deviation.”

McClendon further states the redrawing was done to prevent claims of racial gerrymandering in both areas.

“The two Homewood precincts are majority white. The four center-point area precincts are majority Black,” McClendon said. “Switching Black and white precincts at this point, after the plan was drawn race-blind, would be a race-conscious effort, and that would violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. It will, in fact, create a storm legally for all of us in this room.”

Waggoner’s substitution likewise failed on the Senate floor.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The Senate ultimately voted to pass the congressional district maps 22-7, directly along party lines.

The Alabama House districts bill, carried over earlier in the day by Senate Majority Leader Greg Reed, R-Jasper, due to potential changes to the Senate map in the House that Senate leadership hadn’t been consulted on, was brought before the Senate floor a second time after recess, with no substitution offered from either side and little deliberation.

Smitherman returned to the podium to voice concerns over “several bizarre counties” district lines drawn within the maps and mentioned the bipartisan opposition to the bill’s passage in the House from the previous day but offered no substitution.

The Senate voted 25-7 to pass the House districts.

John is a reporter at the Alabama Political Reporter. You can contact him at jglenn@alreporter.com or via Twitter.

More from APR

Featured Opinion

For some reason, politicians in this state are comfortable with the idea of politicians picking their voters, instead of vice versa.

Courts

Some leaders in the state Republican Party are already looking to reconfigure the 2nd Congressional District yet again.

Congress

The expense is added to an already hefty bill for the suit, with the state paying outside counsel to assist.

Featured Opinion

If the Supreme Court won’t protect our most basic rights, we must reconsider whether it truly merits its outsized power.