Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Featured Opinion

Hubbard Camp in Chaos

By Bill Britt
Alabama Political Reporter

Opinion

According to sources close to the case, House Speaker Mike Hubbard’s legal defense strategy has been thrown into chaos with the exit of J. Mark White.

White’s withdrawal has led to wide-spread speculation that Hubbard is having trouble raising money.

It is believed that Rep. Jack Williams (R-Birmingham) and Hubbard’s attorney Rob Riley were frantically calling to solicit donations to Hubbard’s legal defense fund in the days leading up to Christmas.

December 27, Hubbard signed his approval for White, Arnold and Dowd to withdraw from his case.

The solicitations by Williams and Riley, coupled with the withdrawal of his lead counsel, has created an atmosphere of conspiracy. But it may be a simple matter of money.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Hubbard’s latest FPCA filings show he only paid $38,000 from his campaign account toward legal fees. He also loaned his campaign $100,000 on January 2, but that would not go very far with White, Arnold and Dowd.

At the January 9 hearing on White, Arnold and Dowd’s withdrawal from the trial, Judge Jacob Walker, III, granted White and Dowd an in-camera, ex-parte hearing. The public and prosecution were denied the right to hear why the firm was withdrawing from the case, which the State argued was against the rules of criminal procedures. White and Dowd took several tabbed black binders with them to the closed proceeding. They said they would present Judge Walker with evidence of their conflicts of interest.

White’s statement that his firm must withdraw over a conflict of interest has caused much speculation. Who or what was the conflict? Was this a strategy all along? How did White not know of this conflict in advance? In court, White said the conflict was recent.

The Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct 1.7 defining conflict of interest, 1.7 (b) states, “A lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation of that client may be materially limited by the lawyer’s responsibilities to another client or a third person, or by the lawyer’s own interests.”

Here, the operative phase could very likely be “the lawyer’s own interests.” Let’s speculate that Hubbard’s legal fees, to date, have reached $1.7 million, as he has led others to believe. Hubbard has used only a few hundred thousand from his campaign account to pay White, Arnold and Dowd. Even if we assume he has paid more from his legal defense fund, it is reasonable to believe he is still in arrears?

Several attorneys speaking on background stated that “the lawyer’s own interests” is used when a client is not paying legal fees and it might endanger the future of the law firm.

White and Dowd only spent around three minutes with Judge Walker. A compelling argument for conflict of interest would be Hubbard’s inability to pay could result in bankrupting White, Arnold and Dowd.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Here, Occam’s razor would seem to apply, in which the best explanation of an event is the one that is the simplest, using the fewest assumptions. If that is the case, then it can be assumed that Hubbard couldn’t pay his bills to White’s firm. This doesn’t mean that Hubbard is broke, because this is a man who cried poor to former Gov. Bob Riley, his daughter Minda Riley Campbell and Will Brooke, while claiming on a loan application that he had lots of money.

There is little doubt Hubbard will find the necessary funds to bring in a new attorney.

There is a general belief that Hubbard’s camp is in chaos, that they will request a lengthy continuance allowing them to regroup, and for Hubbard to raise more money as Speaker of the House.

There may be other nefarious plans behind White’s departure but they are far from evident.

All assumptions aside, White’s withdrawal is not welcome news for anyone.

On another subject, I am pleased that Judge Walker issued a gag order which bars attorneys in the Hubbard case from speaking to the media. My only regret is that he didn’t do it after Hubbard and White’s media circus in Lee County, the day after his indictments. Of course, as a friend of White’s said, “If White couldn’t speak to the media, what good would he have been to Hubbard?”

I do feel a little sorry for my media colleagues, because many will not know what to write without White feeding them the story line. But that is good for me and a few other hardworking reporters, because we don’t need attorneys from either side to do our jobs.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Bill Britt is editor-in-chief at the Alabama Political Reporter and host of The Voice of Alabama Politics. You can email him at bbritt@alreporter.com or follow him on Twitter.

More from APR

State

Former prosecutor Matt Hart wrote to AEC commissioners that changes need to be made to rules to ensure basic rights are honored.

Local news

Assistant Director Kaitlin Wilson was fired days after being disciplined for speaking to APR.

Courts

Hubbard will pay $1,000 per month for the next 17 years to cover his fines, court costs and other fees owed to the state.

Legislature

The committee will begin actually crafting the new legislation in the new year, just before the start of the new legislative session.