Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

News

Senate Confirms Lt. Governor Kay Ivey’s Appointment to Ethics Commission

Staff Report

Senate Confirms Lt. Governor Kay Ivey’s Appointment to Ethics Commission

MONTGOMERY, Alabama (January 23, 2014) – The Alabama Senate confirmed Ms. Larkin Martin of Courtland to the Alabama Ethics Commission Thursday. Lieutenant Governor Kay Ivey appointed Ms. Martin to the board April 17, 2013.

Ms. Martin is the manager of two successful family-owned farms, Martin Farm and The Albemarle Corporation, in Courtland, Alabama. She serves on The President’s Council Advisory Board of The University of Alabama and The Farm Foundation Board of Trustees. She is past Chairman of The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and served as Chairman and Director of The Cotton Board, an appointment made by the Secretary Agriculture. Ms. Martin also serves on several civic organizations in her community.

“Ms. Martin demonstrates an outstanding personal and work ethic. I am confident she will render a valuable service on this important Commission.” said Lieutenant Governor Ivey.

Ms. Martin is married to John L. Thornton with four children. Her term is effective immediately and expires August 31, 2018.

This is Lieutenant Governor Ivey’s second appointment to the Ethics Commission since taking office in January 2011.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The Alabama Political Reporter is a daily political news site devoted to Alabama politics. We provide accurate, reliable coverage of policy, elections and government.

Advertisement
Advertisement

More from APR

Health

Tentative agreement keeps Montgomery hospital open while state, local and health care leaders continue searching for a long-term rescue plan.

Courts

Cook’s confirmation would create another Alabama Supreme Court vacancy, giving Governor Kay Ivey the power to appoint his successor.

Prisons

A federal judge specifically carved out room for the state to pursue execution methods other than nitrogen hypoxia.

Featured Opinion

The state is fighting over the method of execution while ignoring the larger question of judicial override.