Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

News

Mo Brooks Discusses NSF Budget

By Brandon Moseley
Alabama Political Reporter 

Congressman Mo Brooks (R) from Huntsville is Chairman of the Subcommittee on Research and Science Education. The Subcommittee met Tuesday to examine the Obama Administration’s proposed fiscal year 2013 budget request for the National Science Foundation (NSF).

During the subcommittee hearing Chairman Brooks said, “It (President Obama’s overall budget proposal) is not sustainable.  It is not responsible.  It is more of the same.  It places America’s future at grave risk.”

Chairman Brooks had less complaint with the NSF budget. Rep. Brooks’ press release said, ”With a current annual budget of $7 billion, NSF is the funding source for over 20 percent of all federally supported basic research conducted by America’s colleges and universities, as well as the primary source of federal funding for non-medical basic research.  NSF also serves as a catalyst for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education improvement at all levels of education, funding fields like mathematics, computer science, and the social sciences.  The FY13 budget request for NSF is $7.4 billion, an increase of $340 million over the FY12 estimated level.”

Subcommittee Chairman Mo Brooks said, “Basic research is an investment in America’s future.”  “The fruits of that research create jobs and opportunities that often-times change our lives, but even this important endeavor must be undertaken in a fiscally responsible way in our current economic environment.”  ““NSF has a long and proven track record, one in which we are all proud, and I have every reason to believe NSF will continue this good work with whatever budgets are forthcoming from Congress.”

Chairman Brooks said, “While a nearly five percent increase for NSF in FY13 shows stronger fiscal constraint than the FY 2012 request at 13 percent, I remain concerned that our federal agencies still are not doing enough to encourage austerity and properly prioritize scarcer federal funds.”

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Rep. Brooks told NSF Director, Dr. Subra Suresh, ‘to be vigilant in making fiscally responsible changes to agency operations by seeking out programs that are “ripe for elimination, consolidation, or reduction.”’

Rep. Brooks’ press release said that the Republicans questioned Dr. Suresh about the Science, Engineering, and Education for Sustainability (SEES) portfolio and whether this type of research was duplicated by other federal agencies.  They also asked about Innovation Corps (I-Corps) and if this new initiative fit the basic research mission of the NSF.

The National Science Foundation was created by Congress in 1950.  NSF provides 20% of the federal funding for basic research at America’s colleges and universities.  In mathematics, social sciences, and computer source the NSF is the largest source of federal funds.  .  The NSF has a director who oversees the daily management and staff and a 24 member National Science Board that meets six times yearly to set NSF policies.  The director, the board, and the deputy director are all appointed by the President of the United States to six year terms.  The NSF headquarters is in Arlington, Virginia and has 2,100 employees.

Congressman Mo Brooks represents Alabama’s fifth Congressional District.  Brooks is in his first term in the United States Congress.  He is opposed in the March 13th Alabama Republican primary by former Congressman Parker Griffith, whom Brooks defeated in the Republican Primary two years ago.  The winner of the Republican Primary will face an Alabama Democratic Party opponent in the November 6th General election. 

To read the Press Release in its entirety:

http://brooks.house.gov/press-releases/subcommittee-examines-fy13-national-science-foundation-budget-proposal/

Brandon Moseley is a former reporter at the Alabama Political Reporter.

More from APR

Opinion

We are arguably one of the most Republican states in America from top to bottom.

Featured Opinion

How has a party that once championed limited government come to assert itself over the most personal dimensions of American life?

Featured Opinion

In today’s GOP, moral character is no longer central; it’s sacrificed when convenient and valued only if it serves power.

Featured Opinion

It’s time to admit that the GOP may not be the bastion of conservatism it claims to be.